![]()
![]() |
Well, its been a long time in the making, but at last we bid you welcome
to the second issue of Prescience. True to form, you will find this second
volume dealing with the leading edge of human thought. In particular, the
concept of Natural Intelligence is once again prominent, especially in Scott
Fossel's awe-inspiring article Divining Gaia: A Radical Lesson In Natural
Philosophy. The idea of Natural Intelligence is simple to state in its essence yet its implications in terms of paradigmatic shift are limitless. Natural Intelligence can be succinctly defined as the inherent smartness of Nature. We know what human intelligence is and we know what artificial intelligence is, yet both fade in the light of Natural Intelligence, especially since it is Nature and the power of Nature to build and organise intelligent biological structures (like our consciousness-embodying brains) which has allowed human intelligence and thence the pursuit of artificial intelligence to flourish. |
|
![]() |
| To fully grasp Natural Intelligence, it is important to bear in mind that intelligence per se can be defined as a process. Our brains embody intelligence since they are able to process information, store information, and thence utilise that information to gain yet more information (i.e. learn). The same applies to artificial intelligence. A clever robot, for instance, is able to gain information and learn, say, about its environment. Or, if one considers an AI system able to recognise faces, then it achieves such intelligent results by utilising algorithms and building up its internal store of information and even modifying its algorithms where possible. Again, it is clear that intelligence can be defined as a process or a system of processes rather than as a thing or object. And if one can discern that intelligence is indeed a process, then it is but a small (albeit brave) step to see that evolutionary natural selection represents the methodological process by which Nature weaves its own magnificent brand of intelligence. Granted, this intelligence takes aeons to perfect and develop, yet this does not mean that it is not intelligent, or, as most scientists would say, that Nature is dumb and mindless. Thus, whilst eminent evolutionary biologist Richard Dawkins chooses to compare Nature to a blind watchmaker, the fact remains that such a sightless watchmaker has verily built visual systems and a remarkable array of other sophisticated sense organs as is apparent in the living world of DNA-writ organisms. |
|
It is also the case that Nature appears to be so coded (in terms of laws and universal constants) so as to manifest an exhaustive search approach to gaining information. Accordingly, all genetic possibilities are 'tried' as it were. Which means that at least some variants will yield fruitful offspring - fruitful in that such offspring will be better adapted to the environment. In this sense, the natural operations of Natural Intelligence were bound to yield conscious brains somewhere along the evolutionary tree of life. Literally, we were poised to be.
Natural Intelligence: always on the move Well, these are radical speculations indeed although I make no apologies for being so conceptually sensational. After all, this is what this electronic magazine be about. So, read on and enjoy. As ever, feedback will be most welcome. Email correspondence addresses can be found both in the Omega and Out section and at the end of some of the articles where the writer is emailable. And one more thing. If you would like to contribute in some way to the evolution of Prescience - be it in words, sponsorship or art - then please do let us know. From little binary acorns do big cyberspatial trees grow.... Nuff said already.
|